Lessons Learned

Instructional Technology - International Education - Wellness

Tag: instructional technologist

Instructional Designers – So Important to Regular and Virtual School

I have written many times about the role of the instructional technologist in our schools. One of their primary skill sets is in instructional design. This past week a few articles on instructional designers came through my various feeds. Here they are.

I wrote about forming a virtual school design team as COVID struck and schools opened this past winter virtually. My conclusion is the same today as it was back in February. We, of course, need an instructional design team to bridge the face-to-face curriculum to virtual delivery. We also need to see this disruption as an opportunity to form instructional design teams in our regular face-to-face school practices. Creating and collaborating to cross-pollinate should be a standard practice in the learning communities we call schools. Design teams can lead in this practice.

Photo by UX Indonesia on Unsplash

Instructional Technology: What and Who? Part 2

I recently posted the first part of my take on where we are with instructional technology, at least in my neighboring public school systems, which are often noted in the press as being at the top of the heap nationwide. It was a “lessons learned” segment reviewing previous posts about my understanding of the evolution and seemingly de-evolution of what it means to be an instructional technologist- again, at least around Northern Virginia.

The bottom line is that we evolved in the late 90s and early 2000s from the Technology Coordinator role of doing everything as managing networks, fixing technology, and, when time provided, offering PD opportunities for teachers to use technology. The new role of an instructional technologist as an innovator, designer, and instruction-focused leader came on the scene through graduate programs, shifting away from technology to instruction and curriculum studies.

My post ended with the reality that we have now moved back to the days of the technology coordinator do-everything role with the growth of web-based instructional systems that need to be managed much as the networks once were. And remember 1:1 device programs that are making their way into more and more public schools. They must also be managed and supported with additional technical position hires in schools going 1:1.

A case in point about this shift back to the days of Technology Coordinators is a job posting I found today for an Instructional Technology Coordinator position from a nearby, very sought-after school district. It starts off spot on with the skill set of Instructional Technologists but then moves into the job area of a technical support person. The list of technical support starts with device management and budgets to then move into what I term “systems administration” with Schoology and “other web-based accounts,” which I suspect there are many with systems like DreamBox, Noodle Tools, Seesaw, MangaHigh, etc. becoming more prevalent in our schools.

So what type of educational background and graduate work does one need to fulfill the requested instructional, technical, and budgetary needs for the position?

So what type of educational background and graduate work does one need to have to fulfill the requested instructional, technical and budgetary needs for the position?

Answer: A degree in education and no graduate studies. One has the content and skill set to perform various roles. That is all one needs.

I appreciate the detail of this job description, especially with the section on the soft skills needed to be a partner in innovation and the role of a change agent. The three other surrounding districts have similar job descriptions.

The usual pattern of technology expenditures on hardware and software coming first is still the norm. Spending funds on instructional and technical support comes second, especially when school districts try to combine the two distinct job roles into one position. As the research shows, leveraging the hardware and software to support HOTS, PBL, inquiry, and other instruction is limited when there is insufficient funding for human capital. With so much spent on devices and web-based systems, the person hired to do this overwhelming job will need to make the technology work. They will spend time setting up user databases for the web-based systems while putting out fires from hardware to software user difficulties each day. There will also be quarterly work to support district web-based standardized tests. The bridging of the technology to instruction and learning in partnering with teachers to design lessons and units that use SAMR and TPACK will suffer.

If school districts cannot hire additional technical staff for their schools, they can, and I suspect some are working to centralize the management of all the web-based systems taking the setting up and ongoing handling of user accounts out of the hands of the school-based instructional technologists. And I am guessing that the providers of the web-based programs are working to make their products easily “integratable” into one login feature that is the holy grail of technology directors. So maybe this is already happening, and hopefully, it will spread to more and more schools so that the Instructional Technologist can do the job they are trained to do.

We have come so far in instructional technology, with many teachers creating and sharing their imaginative lessons via social networks. It is a joy to read the stories of innovative and personalized learning experiences posted worldwide. We have a new generation of leaders taking over for the David Warlicks, Jamie McKenzies, etc. It is a time of rich learning opportunities for our students. School districts must provide funding for instructional technologists and technical support staff in each school. Instructional leadership is essential, especially with principals having so much on their plates. More than ever, schools need to hire those with graduate work in instructional technology, curriculum development, library science, and, if possible, learning support for the full range of learners, including the gifted.

As always, it isn’t about technology; it is about teaching and learning. 🙂

Image Source

Instructional Technology: What and Who? (Lessons Learned) Part 1

Tim Stahmer recently sent a question and a blog post to our VA ISTE community asking, “what is instructional technology”? Tim is a veteran managing instructional technology in an extensive public school system. He shares many lessons learned via his blog and Twitter (@timstahmer).

His post prompted me to reflect on my recent learning about being an instructional technologist in an extensive public school system especially compared to my years overseas. Here is my response to Tim’s definition of instructional technology and my usual long-winded thinking less about the “what” of instructional technology and more about the “who.”

Tim- I am with you where you see instructional technology being about students driving their learning in generative ways. A good portion of my IT grad program was on design and curriculum development, later enhanced using the Understanding by Design approach to curriculum development. I would add that instructional technology also for me includes the design process of collaborating with teachers, librarians, and other learning specialists collaboratively “TPACKing” to create learning activities and assessments that often are improved by using various technologies.

Another question to ask folks is who leads and implements instructional technology in your school. Respondents would point to someone with the title of Technology Integration Specialist, Tech Coordinator, etc. The next question is how much time can this person give to support our definition of instructional technology? If the instructional technologist’s role is about supporting teachers and students to improve learning, who then manages the SIS, LMS, web-aided learning programs (e.g., DreamBox, MangaHigh, etc.) enrollment and ongoing password management, school website, testing programs and database, etc., etc., etc.?

The Instructional Technologist. We know the answer to this question. 

When I was in graduate school at the turn of the century, members of my cohort met and talked about the Technology Coordinator position being joined by a new partner, the Instructional Technologist, to provide the leadership and instruction for using the technology. Brief historical review.

Our discussions eventually led to an article that outlined our description of this new instructional leader role. An article that influenced our thinking was entitled “The Technology Coordinator: Curriculum Leader or Electronic Janitor.” The author’s experience nailed the need to separate technical support from instruction and learning, especially with the expansion of networks and the growing number of computers in schools. And fortunately, upon finishing grad school and returning to international schools, I was told in my interview that “we have technical support people who fix and run everything. Your job is to provide the bridge for the technology into the classroom”.

Jumping to the present, we have enjoyed the growth and development of how instructional technologists provide imagination, PLN connectivity, program development, and leadership in advancing teaching and learning in the 21st century. Yet in my one year in a public school system, I found myself going back in time feeling like an electronic janitor. It wasn’t about supporting a network or repairing laptops so much (a technician was on hand half of the week in my elementary school); it was “systems overload” and management that drove my work instead of student learning.

While student information systems have been around for a while, the growth of LMSs, web-aided instructional programs, testing databases, school websites, etc., took time away from instructional and student creativity support. When you add that more and more public schools are providing mobile devices to their students, you can guess who supports these programs.

Making things worse, I remember attending a meeting about the planned rollout of laptops K-12 in a couple of the district pyramids of schools. The answer for my district would be to fund the assignment of a technical support person full-time to all the elementary schools, thus getting back to where we hoped instructional technologists would be at the turn of the century. The full-time technical support specialist could be the systems administrator and repair person. I asked how many additional staff members would be hired in each school to support the 1:1 program. The answer was none.

So while it is 2017, it feels more like 1997.

Here is a review of posts and podcast posts about the role of the Instructional Technologist.

Lessons Learned Blog Posts>

Ed Tech Co-Op Podcast>

Image Source

The Instructional Technologist: What We Do (Part 2)

how

Maybe I should rephrase the title of this post as “How we do.”

In other words, how do we implement the processes, structures, dispositions, skills, and systems that ultimately help students learn the content, skills, and concepts set out by their teachers? While I think I hit on these topics to some degree in my previous post, here are a few articles that go deeper providing more of the mechanisms that instructional technologists can follow to do their jobs and make a difference in their schools.

All Aboard! How a new curriculum-development review process brought teachers, administrators, and learning specialists to the table and resulted in some innovative uses of technology > My wife Margaret and I authored this piece describing how we, as the instructional technologist and library media specialist collaborated with teams of teachers to design curriculum that incorporated ICL skills and enhanced learning. The curriculum collaboration system we created offers one way to take the theoretical TPACK framework and apply it in a K-12 setting.

The Construct is in the Eye of Beholder: School Districts’ Appropriations and Reconceptualization of TPACK > Dr. Judi Harris and Dr. Mark Hofer summarize their findings from meeting with representatives of school districts in the US and Canada. They discovered many exciting things about how schools use the TPACK construct in practice and PD. One big takeaway was the process of “TPACKing,” which includes the instructional technologist as a coach and co-curriculum designer.

10 Self-Evaluation Tips for Technology Integration Specialists > Dr. Stephanie Hatten provides excellent guiding questions for instructional technologists to consider as they decide what they do and how they provide services. I would add to her post that we need to move beyond the “Technology Integration Specialist” job title just as we moved past “Technology Coordinator” at the end of the 90s. As I have written about and shared in the podcast, we should consider calling ourselves “learning specialists.” We must consider technology as just one piece of our overall information and communication skill approach to supporting students in our information and media-rich world. The Information and Communication Literacies (ICL) construct includes technology, especially when partnering with one’s school librarian.

Image Source

The Instructional Technologist: Job Title and Description

 job title

Technology Integration Specialist, Technology Facilitator, Technology Coach, Technology Coordinator… lots of job titles for what those with degrees in instructional or educational technology do. Going back to the 90s, the usual job title was technology coordinator. The technology coordinator was mainly the person who kept all the technology working.

As we moved into the 2000s, the graduate training and expectations from K-12 administrators began to change. I remember having chats with members of my cohort at UVA about the shift from technical to curriculum support. We also discussed the possibility of a new title for the technology coordinator. Those discussions led to the article Fulfilling the Need for a Technology Integration Specialist by Mark Hofer, Barbara Chamberlin, and Tammy Scott. Definitely worth reading to see where we were in 2004 as we think about where we are today and where we are headed in the field of instructional technology.

I feel strongly that one’s job title is very important and should communicate what we do. My previous post gets at this. In searching for an image to add to this post, I ran across the thinking of George Couros, who wrote a similar piece in his blog. What we do is not about technology but about learning. Enough said/written. 🙂

I remember attending an international job fair in 2002, wondering if school leaders were looking for instructional technologists or old-style technology coordinators. It quickly became evident that many international schools had shifted as school heads said, “We need instructional leaders. We have technicians to fix things”.

The Edtech Co-Op podcast and this blog consistently describe the need to make the guiding principle in our field to be one of working to support teaching and learning, especially in the use of information, communication, and creativity. Technology is a part of the process, but the more important skills among many include design, communication, collaboration, and leadership (more on this in a future post). As for job titles, I tried in a couple of my schools to change my title to “learning or instructional specialist/coach.” I recently ran across some titles using “innovator, innovation” as part of the title, among other choices.

It will be interesting when my wife and I return to international teaching as to whether cutting-edge schools have made this change or will be up for the possibility. We hope that potential schools will have already combined library and instructional technology services into the combined Information and Communication Literacies (ICL) approach that has taken root at my last two schools in the US.

While I have written a few job descriptions for my position at schools over the years, I can say the one handed to me at my start at Washington International School is a gem. While I don’t like the job title, I do really like what the authors produced.

 

Primary School Learning & Technology Coordinator
Washington International Primary School

The Primary School Learning & Technology Coordinator is a campus-wide leadership role responsible for the effective and meaningful integration of technology across the curriculum. A member of the Information Services team, the Learning & Technology Coordinator ensures that digital tools and resources are integrated in a fashion that reflects the school’s mission and instructional objectives. Reports to: Director of Information Services

Curriculum & Instructional Coordination

  • Coordinates, assesses, and implements a sustainable plan for integrating the WIS Standards for the Connected Learner across the primary school curriculum.

  • Collaborates with Middle/Upper School Learning & Technology Coordinator and Director of Information Services to develop, implement, and sustain a preK-12 continuum of standards and instructional integration.

  • Develops, maintains, and organizes an instructional planning tool that is utilized for all IT/IL projects.

  • Leads regular meetings with instructional team to share information, identify instructional objectives, plan for instruction, and implement embedded support and coordination.

  • Collaborates with subject area leaders, curriculum coordinator and administration to plan instructional integration across the academic year.

  • Researches and explores instructional resources for implementation in the primary school curriculum.

  • Provides frequent feedback to primary school faculty members about the use of instructional technology in their curriculum.

  • Promotes ethical use of information and technology through respect for intellectual property and adhering to appropriate laws.

Instructional Resource Management

  • Collaborates with PS Librarian to ensure that use of Library is coordinated and effectively utilized for integration of standards.

  • Provides oversight of development, implementation, and assessment of all instructional technology resources on Primary School campus.

  • Advises Director of Information Services on acquisition of software, hardware, and other digital resources for implementation in curriculum.

Professional Development

  • Coordinates professional development program for Primary School faculty.

  • Assesses and communicates professional development needs and interests of Primary School teachers.

  • Collaborates with PS Librarian and Director of Information Services to offer varied and relevant professional development opportunities.

  • Provides embedded professional support for teachers, with the goal to move them across a continuum of competence and towards independence of technology use.

  • Takes initiative to develop co-teaching and instructional support framework; collaborate with faculty members to facilitate learning opportunities for all students.

  • Develop training and support materials for use of technology resources; take a lead role in coordinating, disseminating, and using these resources in professional development with faculty members.

  • Collaborate with Director of Information Services to assess professional development program on an ongoing basis.

Technical Support

  • Collaborate with Help Desk Coordinator in conducting Level I troubleshooting, where appropriate.

  • Promote and facilitate effective reporting of problems and issues to Help Desk Coordinator.

Teacher

  • Acts as a curricular leader and participates in instructional planning, including attending subject, grade level and division meetings as requested.

  • Works daily with students and staff in classrooms or project studio areas, on integrated projects that enhance technology skills.

  • Continually explores and updates knowledge and skills in pedagogy, information literacy and technology in order to enhance and expand students’ learning and achievement.

Team Member

  • As member of Information Services team, works collaboratively with team members to develop shared sense of responsibility, collaboration, and support.

  • Uses public forum to support team goals, objectives, and philosophies.

  • Participates in active communication with team members to identify issues of concern among faculty, staff, students and parents; collaborates to arrive at common solutions that will address these issues.

  • Serves as lead mentor/ coordinator in divisional IT mentorship groups.

Next Post: What we do

Image Source  Note: The idea for using this image came from George Couros.

The Instructional Technologist and Teacher Librarian: PD to the Classroom

With the Blogosphere and Twitterverse filled with discussions about how to shift schools, focus on 21st-century skills, create and promote learning communities, provide PD, etc., it seems like an opportune time to revisit the roles of the instructional technologist and teacher librarian as leaders and change agents in our schools. We planned on making this a topic in an upcoming EdTech Co-op podcast, but a blog post leads me to share some ideas now.

Tim Holt’s recent post about the role of professional trainers and speakers hit a nerve for many folks and has led to many discussions about how to bring about change in our schools. My response is to put forth the instructional technologist and librarian as key leaders in schools who should follow up on professional development (PD) activities to facilitate the action steps to connect the learning from the PD to the learning in our classrooms. 

As for the considerable topic of shifting our schools, Jeff Utecht and I produced a podcast all about Shifting Our Schools. Please look at the show notes, as our guests brought many helpful ideas. Only the latest podcasts are still accessible via iTunes.

While Tim argues that the educational gurus should offer us the how-to’s on how to shift our schools, the pushback is that each school is different, and the road maps must be individualized. I agree with this and see that there are many ways to offer professional development for our learning communities. Still, the key is the follow-up after the PD, which is not the responsibility of PD providers. Whether one brings in educational trainers, sends staff off to conferences, runs book discussions, or has teachers take courses, the bottom line is that there are many choices and that each educator should be empowered to design and build their professional learning network as so many in the blogosphere promote.

It is then up to the school’s leadership to create the mechanism involving the use of time and support to empower the staff to develop the “how to” to take PD learning into the classrooms. Administrators provide this essential leadership, but the instructional technologist and teacher-librarian often are the doers, either working via the curriculum review process or collaborating individually or with groups of teachers who turn the PD into action.

Whether you call your school instructional technologist a technology integration specialist, educational technologist, learning coach, or whatever, it is crucial to realize what this well-skilled leader can do for your school. One can review the posts and articles by library leaders to paint the picture of the modern teacher librarian, or you could review the skill set and 21st-century vision of my wife, the library media specialist at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology.

To paint the picture of an instructional technologist, here is a MindMeister mind map I created several years ago for a conference in China where the participants helped build out the IT/ET job description, including experience and skill set for a 21st-century instructional technologist. Hopefully, it provides a discussion point on whether you have an instructional technologist or want to hire one but need a job description.

We will soon be discussing this topic further in the Edtech Co-op podcast.

Your Teaching and Learning Team

How is your student support team organized? Who is on the team? Are you providing mainly pullout, pull-in, or build-in services? How is your professional development system connected to this team and its mission? There are many questions to ask when we step back and think about the best way to provide reinforcement, enrichment, and an overall differentiated learning environment for our students.

Over the past few years, I have focused on building a systematic approach to developing a curriculum. One aspect of this approach is forming a team approach to build out units of study that incorporate ICL integration, differentiation of instruction and assessment, meeting school-wide goals, etc. Efforts by our learning support team at Alexandria Country Day School and a recent article in the Davidson Journal (Davidson College in NC) reminded me that we should also look at systems supporting student learning outside the curriculum review process.

I remember the early 1990s at the American International School-Riyadh when we developed a student support system for the middle school. The team members included all the teachers, an administrator, the counselor, and the learning support teachers. We created the structure of common meeting times for the two teams at each grade level. One day a week, we discussed individual student learning needs, while on another day, the focus was on the curriculum. We used technology to record learning plans, goals, and results in the student information system. However, the librarian was absent in the meetings while the technology teacher visited to share his lessons and not so much as a collaborator in the curriculum process.

We were ahead of the curve in many ways but failed to make the connection between needing to bring more specialists on board for the curriculum and, just as importantly, for the learning support. The technology teachers and the librarians could have collaborated in both areas to make a difference for our students.

Returning to today, the article from the Davidson Journal explains how the college recently brought different groups of learning support teams together under one roof– the library. As so many of us write about, the library/media center/learning community should be at the center of one’s school/campus. It makes total sense to bring your technology specialists and your other learning support teachers into the library. It also makes sense to have your instructional technologist and teacher librarian as members of your learning support team when creating a curriculum review system and as partners in grade level/department meetings when creating learning support strategies.

An additional item to note is that this team is naturally skilled with “building in” learning support strategies to be added to the units in your curriculum mapping tool. By documenting strategies in your curriculum system to support struggling and students needing enrichment, you move away from the old “pullout” support model. 

I learned from Dr. Mary Landrum and my wife’s expertise as a GATE coordinator that the more we can collaborate with teachers to develop learning activities and assessments together, the more that they can pull learning strategies off “the shelf” of the curriculum tool to support students without calling for them to be pulled out of their classes. While Dr. Landrum teaches mainly about providing instruction for gifted students, her book Consultation in Gifted Education: Teachers Working Together to Serve Students provides a collaboration model that can be used to meet the whole spectrum of student needs.

And back to how your professional development program is run, one hopes for teacher involvement in choosing topics and the teaching and learning team adding their insights. This team’s engagement puts them in an excellent position to assess the instructional needs across the school. 

I am rambling here, but if you are interested in learning more about Davidson’s new program, I wrote a post for my school’s blog about the Davidson article and how our school was following the same model. Here is that post>

___________________________

Davidson College is known as a very academic liberal arts college that is dedicated to supporting the craft of teaching by its professors. Davidson’s professors do research and write articles and books, but their primary focus is on teaching. To support their efforts, as part of the strategic plan, Davidson opened its Center for Teacher and Learning (CTL) in the school library in August.

The connection to Alexandria Country Day School is that we also opened our Teaching and Learning Center (TLC) in August. What is striking in reading an article from the Fall 2011 Davidson Journal is how similar the two programs are. It demonstrates the forward-thinking and student-centered nature of our administrators and TLC staff when we mirror the program of a college such as Davidson.

Central to the work of our TLC team members is the focus on collaboration with the classroom teachers. This partnership, looking at how best to reach learning goals and meet individual student needs, drives how the TLC teachers help design instruction and provide one-to-one support for our students.

An additional part of this “collaboration team” approach to supporting teaching and learning is the involvement of our instructional technologist, teacher librarian, and director of technology. As part of the iPad pilot program, the fifth-grade teachers worked with our technology and library team members over the summer to review and adapt the fifth-grade curriculum to further support the students in attaining skills for the 21st century. The curriculum was further adapted to meet the information, media, and visual literacy standards supported by the American Association of School Librarians (AASL) and the technology literacies published as the National Educational Technology Standards (NETS) for students. Members of the TLC will join the collaboration team in January as they review the sixth-grade curriculum in preparation for next year and the continued roll “forward” of the iPad Pilot program.

The Davidson Journal article describes the same team effort of the Center for Teaching and Learning – “(the CTL)…brings together these centers- along with the instructional technologists and information literacy librarians- to help students take a comprehensive approach to strengthening academic skills. The CTL also advises faculty who want to experiment with new teaching tools and to discuss different approaches to teaching.”

Davidson College is in good company with its pioneering efforts. 🙂

 

Image Source

 

How Can We Help Teachers Take More Risks in their Teaching?

John Mikton will join Jeff and me to talk about this question on the Shifting Our Schools podcast taking place tonight. To answer this question, the starting point is to work with teachers individually to ask them what needs to happen to help them try new ideas in their teaching and learning. Large workshops or sending folks to conferences are not the starting point to help build a culture of risk-taking. Large-scale PD efforts can provide models of shifted practices and get folks excited to try new things, but it still comes back to each teacher in their classroom trying new ideas in their teaching. It is helpful to talk to teachers a few weeks after returning from a conference to see how things are going in trying some of the practices they saw at the conference. They often need to act on their excitement of learning new approaches due to barriers in their schools.

We know the list of barriers often affecting teachers in many ways, not just in not taking risks (i.e., not enough time, too much to cover in the curriculum, assigned tasks that don’t support student learning, parent expectations, etc.). Experience tells me that by talking with individual teachers, finding practices they are confident in using in their classrooms, and then asking what they see as engaging in other classrooms or their professional reading, we, as learning specialists/coaches (instructional technologists, librarians, learning support, GATE facilitators, curriculum coordinators, etc.) can then help them take small first steps to try new things starting within their area of comfort.

One theme that runs through many of our podcasts about shifting practices and schools is leadership. While learning specialists can make a huge difference in supporting teachers and learning in the classroom, our administrators can help push the shift by modeling risk-taking by setting a tone for the school that trying new ideas is expected. By communicating to the larger community through various communication avenues (e.g., blogs, email, Twitter, various presentation tools in parent meetings, etc.), the administrator takes risks with new technology while inviting parents to understand and expect risk-taking as part of the school culture. Celebration of teachers and students taking risks should be central to the shift in culture. While much of the focus will be on successful risk-taking, we must highlight when the results didn’t quite work out and learning took place. 🙂

Let’s work with individuals while having the community assess the nature of our current school culture. In that case, we can gather the information needed to create an action plan to build a climate that supports risk-taking. While this process might take some time, if we start immediately by having our learning specialists/coaches work with teachers to share their opinions about barriers and needed actions for support while having our administrators lead by example, we can start helping educators take more risks in their teaching.

How to Infuse Information Literacy Skills Across the Curriculum? SOS Episode 16

We have three essential questions for this show:

  • How to infuse information literacy skills across the curriculum?
  • Where does the use of technology fit into the information literacy picture?
  • How does a modern library media specialist fit into the shifting process?

The possible answers to these questions start with the library media specialist trained in using digital information tools and generative technologies for student sharing of their research. This individual is a leader in their school, working with the instructional technologist as designers and collaborators in the curriculum review process to embed the various information & communication literacy (ICL) skills throughout the curriculum.

© 2024 Lessons Learned

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

Skip to toolbar